🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for him, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he does because then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.